Deliberative Dialogue Series Continues on February 13
This academic year’s Deliberative Dialogue Series will continue on February 13 with a forum focused on the women’s rights movement from a contemporary perspective.
Titled “Feminism Today: Inclusive Modern Movement or Outdated Relic?” the 90-minute forum will be held in Room 112 of the Andreas Building on Barry’s main campus in Miami Shores, beginning at 4 p.m.
An all-female panel will discuss generational perspectives, the intersections of race and feminism, the Me Too Movement (#MeToo), and current efforts in the larger fight for gender equality. Community partners and faculty members will be among the panelists.
Addressing Homelessness
The first forum in the series, in November, addressed the issue of homelessness.
To prevent homelessness, a comprehensive approach involving program implementation, service delivery, and advocacy is necessary. That was the main takeaway from the forum titled “Preventing Homelessness: Responding to the Challenge.”
Community and campus participants saw the shortage of affordable housing as “one of the biggest challenges” and concluded that the Housing First model could be one of the best solutions to homelessness.
Housing First is described as “a proven method of ending all types of homelessness” and “the most effective approach to ending chronic homelessness.” Promoted by the U.S. Interagency Council on Homelessness, Housing First offers individuals and families experiencing homelessness immediate access to permanent affordable or supportive housing. Without clinical prerequisites such as completion of a course of treatment or evidence of sobriety, Housing First has reportedly yielded higher housing retention rates, lower returns to homelessness, and significant reductions in the use of crisis service and institutions.
The Deliberative Dialogue forum engaged students, alumni, faculty and staff members, and community partners in exploring the effects of such factors as lack of affordable housing, unemployment, mental health diseases, and substance abuse. The participants examined several methods of addressing homelessness before proposing specific solutions, including advocacy of development initiatives that make provision for affordable housing.
“We need a frontal approach – an all-inclusive approach,” said Michael J. Calderin, chief operating officer of the Susan B. Anthony Recovery Center. He suggested that such an approach would encompass vocational training, job referrals, occupational therapy, supportive housing, and other programs and services.
Dr. Cassandra L. Scott, a visiting assistant professor in Barry’s School of Social Work, similarly emphasized the importance of “a long-term, systematic response – not just an emergency response.” She also stressed the “need to elect public officials who will fight for change.”
Scott, who has run a transitional housing program, called for “continuous advocacy and support for organizations addressing homelessness.” She suggested that community members “bridge the gap between lawmakers and those who are homeless.”
Barry alumna Ruth Auguste shared her clinical case management experience at KID, Inc. in Broward County, where she is assigned to the HEART (Housing, Empowerment, Achievement, Recovery, Triumph) program. She said her caseload involved many persons who were “a paycheck away from becoming homeless.”
Auguste recommended “a holistic approach” to the problem of homelessness.
Joining Calderin, Scott, and Auguste on a panel of lead participants at the forum were Rose Anderson, a psychiatric nurse practitioner for Camillus Health Concern’s Lazarus Project, and Daniqua Williams, a Barry graduate student in the counseling program. Williams also is the QEP (Quality Enhancement Plan) project assistant.
Anderson urged kind treatment of homeless persons who often panhandle near traffic lights.
Williams, who is pursuing a master’s in counseling, shared part of her experience working as a counselor in a drug abuse treatment program in Tampa.
During the deliberation, Barry Experiential Learning Coordinator Liz James drew attention to the efforts by a faith-based coalition called PACT (People Acting for Community Together) to tackle the shortage of affordable housing as a major issue in Miami-Dade County. She noted that PACT leaders recently decided to continue working with public officials and to hold them accountable for previous agreements made to improve access to affordable housing.
Earlier, other forum participants suggested that housing be promoted as a human right and that increased emphasis be placed on the prevention of drug addiction and several mental illnesses, which contribute to homelessness.
The dialogue moderator was Dr. Mitch Rosenwald, a Barry professor of social work and a licensed clinical social worker.
Courtney Berrien, associate director of the Center for Community Service Initiatives (CCSI), thanked the community and campus participants for contributing to a thought-provoking and productive forum.
The CCSI organizes the Deliberative Dialogue Series as a method of civic learning and engagement in addressing social issues of current concern. The series brings together campus and community stakeholders to weigh perspectives about the issues and to work toward practical solutions.
SEMESTER SCHEDULE
“Feminism Today: Inclusive Modern Movement or Outdated Relic?” Tuesday, February 13 | 4:00–5:30 p.m. | Andreas 112
“Fracking in Florida: Good for the Economy and Bad for the Environment?” Tuesday, April 10 | 4:00–5:30 p.m. | Andreas 112
|
Deliberative Dialogue is one of eight co-curricular events that the QEP Implementation Committee has designated as “PSR.” It is a series of facilitated forums eliciting “voices and views from campus and community.” Students, alumni, faculty, staff, and community partners take part in the forums, working toward a shared understanding of specific social issues and practical solutions to those issues.
Co-curricular programs, projects, and events that carry the “PSR” are geared to achieve at least one of the six personal and social responsibility outcomes of the QEP. The outcomes are categorized as (1) Ethical and Moral Reasoning, (2) Engaging Diverse Perspectives, and (3) Community Engagement and Collaboration. Each category contains two specific student learning outcomes.
Deliberative Dialogue forums fulfill three student learning outcomes — two in the “Engaging Diverse Perspective” category and the third in “Community Engagement and Collaboration.”
|