AI, MD

Maria Pineda ’07, CEO and co-founder of Envisagenics

by Dan Morrell How Maria Pineda is using artificial intelligence to design more effective drugs Maria Pineda ’07, CEO and co-founder of biotechnology company Envisagenics, showed an interest in science and technology at a very young age.

She credits her schoolteachers in Colombia, who would often employ project-based instruction rather than lectures. One favorite example: A teacher asked the students to design and build a ramp that would land a ball in a cup positioned far across the room. “So we had to do all the physics calculations and equations for velocity and speed and length—and take into account the air and friction,” Pineda said. “It really sparked a kind of enthusiasm for understanding the complexity of the science that can go into something so simple.”

Today, Pineda is using complex science and artificial intelligence (AI) to do something radical: transforming how we discover new disease-fighting drugs. In this Q&A, Pineda—who also serves as the vice chair of the Alliance for Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare (AAIH)—discusses how her time at Barry shaped her career, the breakthrough technology behind the founding of Envisagenics, and how AI will shape the future of healthcare.

Maria Pineda's headshot

DM: You had an early curiosity about science and technology. How did that curiosity propel you through your educational career?

MP: When I immigrated to this country from Colombia, I was a high school student and I really liked robotics and genetics. I was selected for a program for gifted high school students. I was able to work for advanced placement credits in the lab at Barry University. My mother drove me every day after school and waited for me in the Barry library.

"I met this wonderful professor at Barry, Dr. Gerhild Packert, who allowed me to do research in her lab as a high school student."

I studied a particular genetic abnormality that caused a fly to have a leg grow out of its head and presented my research at a science and engineering fair. And I think I was in the country for maybe six months at that point! I learned so much watching Dr. Packert, and was also trained by Drs. Lin, Petrino, and Redway.

I studied that particular case throughout my time at Barry and ended up discovering the cause was a piece of RNA. I never stopped trying to find out how it worked, and my professor and my lab at Barry were both really essential to that foundational training. I am grateful for the support of my professors at Barry who set me on the path of science and entrepreneurship. In my work, I make efforts to mentor students, because I know how fortunate I was to have the support of strong role models in the field.

DM: Help me understand the biology of how RNA impacts our bodies.

MP: We learn in the classroom about the “central dogma” of life: DNA is the material of all cellular organisms; proteins make all of our tissues and allow our body to function; RNA is the message that tells the DNA what types of protein to create, and it is responsible for all of our diversity. After all, you, me, and the common fly all have the same genes, but it is our RNA that differentiates us.

DM: When did you start to work at the intersection of the ideas of artificial intelligence in healthcare?

MP: Questions and stumbling blocks in my research prompted me to turn to AI, then a relatively new technology. As my questions multiplied, I found that technology could help fill in many of those gaps. When I was in graduate school at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, it used to take us weeks or months to analyze one genome, and it required huge servers that took up a whole room. Since then, the technology has evolved. Today, at Envisagenics, we can analyze 2,000 patients’ full genomes in under two hours using cloud computing and without any devices larger than a coffee machine.

DM: What was the founding vision of the company? What was the problem that you were trying to solve?

MP: My co-founder, Dr. Martin Akerman, and I started the company with the premise of using RNA therapeutics as the basis and then employing all of this technology—including cloud computing and machine learning—to quickly and accurately identify disease targets. For context, when I first started in the field, we used to design 300 to 500 short pieces of RNA, which were synthesized for about $3,000 to $5,000 apiece. Then we would have to inject each of those into subjects and analyze the results, which took months or even years. Now, we basically put those questions into machine-learning algorithms, and through repetition, we can get those 500 options down to five.

Envisagenics spun out of Cold Spring Harbor Lab. My co-founder, Martin, called me a little while after we graduated and said, “Hey Maria, remember what we were working on back at the lab?” It was a drug for children with spinal muscular atrophy, which is a horrible genetic disorder that makes children’s muscles stop working. Martin said that our professor at Cold Spring Harbor had been receiving hand-written thank-you notes from children who had taken the drug. They were able to write, which meant they had been cured. The treatment, Spinraza®, was created in 2016, and it was the first FDA-approved treatment for this fatal disease. With that idea in mind, we started Envisagenics in 2014. We have partnered with the brilliant scientists at Johnson & Johnson (2020), Biogen (2021), and Bristol Myers Squibb (2022), to name a few, to advance the discovery of treatments for breast cancer, other oncology, and neurodegenerative and metabolic diseases.

DM: Envisagenics is developing its own line of therapeutics and has partnered with other pharmaceutical companies on drug discovery projects. You’ve also raised venture capital funding. What does growth look like for your company? And what excites you about the things this company can do next?

MP: We are a platform company, and we focus that platform on diseases that have RNA errors, like cancer. Cancers affected by RNA include breast, lung, colorectal, and some types of leukemia, and what excites me is using the platform to develop effective therapeutics, either by partnering with pharma to get drugs to patients faster or by using our technology to develop some novel RNA therapeutics ourselves. It’s great to partner with other pharmaceutical companies, but it’s even better to have the vision and create your own.

At the end of the day, the priority is for patients to receive the best therapy available. If we need to partner with a pharma company in order to diversify our chemistry solutions based on the targets that our platform can identify, so be it. It’s about answering the question: How do we get there? The goal is to figure out how we get there efficiently, economically, and with a more personalized diagnostic understanding of the mechanism, and which patients will benefit.

DM: Your role as vice chair for The Alliance for Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare (AAIH) offers you a wide perspective on artificial intelligence and healthcare. What are some of the challenges to adoption that artificial intelligence faces?

MP: What we hear about the most is the hype—that there are still many unknowns with AI as it applies to patients. We also hear the fears— that it is this “black box” that is incomprehensible and unpredictable. I get it. You just don’t want to be cured by something that you don’t understand. But this bias comes from a lack of awareness.

There are certain things that we can do as drug developers that will allow us to break down those negative perceptions of AI and machine learning. Standardization, data quality controls, and policy regulation are becoming more established so people will feel more comfortable with the process as time goes on. But until something that was created with machine learning or AI has been approved and commercialized, you will see doubts.

Even today, we see people questioning how RNA was used to develop the COVID vaccines, even though those vaccines have saved countless lives. I think when it comes to adoption, it will be the same thing for AI. It will require regulators and groups like the AAIH—which includes pharma, academic institutions, venture capitalists, biotechs, and startups—all working together so that we can understand what rules and regulations we should put in place so that people can feel more comfortable with these new therapies.

Sign in to use the pins